Legal Opinion
Dal-Bac (Pty.), Ltd. v. Firma Astorwerk Otto Berning & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 30, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYATT, District Judge.
This is a motion by plaintiff Dal-Bac (Pty.) Ltd. (“Bal-Dac”), and a cross-motion by defendant Firma Astorwork *517Otto Berning & Co. (“Astor”) for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
The action is one for a declaratory judgment (28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202) that United States Letters Patent No. 2,924,-865 — a patent for a “buckle for belts or the like” — are invalid or, if valid, that the Dal-Bac product does not infringe. Approved Accessories, Inc. (“Accessories”), the named co-defendant, does not join in Astor’s cross-motion.
In addition to a declaratory judgment, Dal-Bac in its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United States Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Vermont Structural Slate Company, Inc. v. Tatko Brothers Slate Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Technical Tape Corporation v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Cee-Bee Chemical Co., Inc., a Corporation v. Delco Chemicals, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Xerox Corporation v. Dennison Manufacturing CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Malsbary Manufacturing Co. v. Ald, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1970
- G. B. Lewis Co. v. Gould Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1968