Goodrich v. Musgrave Fence & Auto Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polh District Court. — Hon. W. H. McHenry, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for personal injury. There was a directed verdict and judgment for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
An automobile driven by one Crejl and another driven by the plaintiff collided upon one of the streets of the city of Des Mo.ines, with the result that plaintiff’s car was broken and injured.' The circumstances of the collision were sufficient to justify a finding that it was occasioned by the negligence of Crell, and without contributory negligence on plaintiff’s part. This action is brought to recover damages from the Musgrave Fence '& Auto Company on the theory and claim that at the time of said occurrence Crell was the agent or employee of the defendant in the -operation of the car by…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Cruse-Crawford Mfg. Co. v. RuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Hill v. StaatsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Bertrand v. Mutual Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Mosby v. KimballIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.