Highland v. Russell Car & Snow Plow Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
Defendant, a foreign corporation authorized to do business in Pennsylvania, appealed from the order of the court of common pleas refusing to set1 aside service of the writ of summons and quash the writ.
*220Plaintiff moved to quash the appeal on the ground that the order is interlocutory and no appeal lies from it.
It was the settled practice in this State, established by many decisions of the Supreme Court, that such an order is interlocutory and cannot be appealed from: Coleman’s App., 75 Pa. 441, 460; Lycoming Fire Ins. Co. v. Storrs, 97 Pa. 354; Bennethum v. Bowers, 133 Pa.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coleman's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
- McCullough v. Railway Mail Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Frank P. Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Vandersloot v. Pennsylvania Water & Power Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Bird v. SleppySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Trust Co. v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924