Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

TYNER v. MATTA-TRONSCOSO

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 11, 2019No. S18G0364Published

1Opinion of the Court

305 Ga. 480

FINAL COPY S18G0364. TYNER v. MATTA-TRONCOSO et al. WARREN, Justice. On January 8, 2014, Maria Matta-Troncoso and her husband, Mario Matta (“the Mattas”), sued Michael and Lakeisha Thornton, alleging that the Thorntons were liable under OCGA § 51-2-71 for injuries that Matta-Troncoso sustained when the Thorntons’ dogs attacked her as she was walking her own dogs approximately two blocks away from the Thorntons’ rental house. On August 20, 2014, the Mattas amended their complaint by adding Gregory B. Tyner, the Thorntons’ landlord, alleging that he was liable under OCGA § 44- 1 The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Sturbridge Partners, Ltd. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  2. Goldstein, Garber & Salama, LLC v. J. B.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  3. Colquitt v. RowlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  4. Toyo Tire North America Manufacturing, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  5. Doe v. Prudential-Bache/A.G. Spanos Realty Partners, L. P.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API