State v. Jessen
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Defendant appeals from his convictions on three counts of attempted rape in the second degree, ORS 161.405 1 and ORS 163.365. 2 Defendant asserts that there was insufficient evidence to prove that he engaged in conduct constituting a substantial step toward the commission of those crimes and, therefore, that the trial court erred in denying his motions for judgment of acquittal. For the following reasons, we affirm.
In reviewing the denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal, we resolve any conflicts in the evidence in favor of the state and give the state the benefit of all inferences that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. KrummacherOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Roger Matthew Walters v. Manfred Maass, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. WaltersOregon Supreme Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. BadilloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. SpielerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Gill v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. MINOWCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011