Legal Opinion
Brock v. Standard Oil Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 4, 1940No. 81PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, District Judge.
The libellant, a seaman, brought an action in personam in admiralty (1) for damages based on alleged negligence, and (2) for maintenance and cure.
The action for damages contained three counts:(1) That the injury was caused by the negligence of the respondent in failing to protect the libellant against assault of a fellow-employee ;(2) That the respondent failed to provide proper medical and surgical care and attention; and(3) That the respondent compelled the libellant to work despite his injuries.
The first count has been withdrawn bj counsel for the libellant (p. 2,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- The Bouker No. 2Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- The City of AlexandriaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883
- Barlow v. Pan Atlantic SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- The AlectorDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Kable v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Oliver v. Calmar S. S. CoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Kontos v. S.S. Sophie C.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.