Legal Opinion
Wydallis v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 16, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, with costs to plaintiff, by reinstating the first and second causes of action of the complaint and, as so modified, affirmed.
In 1978 defendant sold two policies of insurance to Puritan Industries, Inc., a New York corporation, whose princi*874pal place of business was Auburn, Massachusetts. The first, an all risk policy, provided coverage in the face amount of $1,265,000. The second, entitled a “Comprehensive Dishonesty, Disappearance and Destruction Policy” provided coverage in the face amount of $25,000. Both…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Markoff v. South Nassau Community HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Proc v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. E. W. Smith Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Bargaintown, D.C., Inc. v. Bellefonte InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3Cited by7 opinions
- Voss v. Multifilm Corp. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Rinaldi v. RochfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- American International Group, Inc. v. Countrywide Financial Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- DUNLOP, EVA E. v. SAINT LEO THE GREAT R.C. CHURCHAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Varga v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.