Legal Opinion

Durel v. Flach

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1925No. 9570PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWesterfield, J.

This case results from an intersectional collision. Plaintiff sues for damages to his automobile and personal injuries to himself, and defendant reconvenes for damages to his car.

When the case was argued before us, defendant’s counsel called our attention to the fact that the automobile of defendant at the. time of the accident was being driven by the wife of defendant upon a pleasure trip and that defendant was not present. He argues that this circumstance relieves defendant from liability. Defendant’s counsel asserts, and it is conceded, that .this point was not made in defendant’s answer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McClure v. McMartinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
  2. Mittelstadt v. KellyMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Tanzer v. ReadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Farthing v. StrouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  5. Burnstein v. FalloSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tarleton-Gaspard v. MalocheeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Tuck v. HarmonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Battalora v. Carnahan CreameryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Brantley v. ClarksonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Howard v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API