Bowman v. Day
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Harrison District Court. — Hon. Geo. W. Wakefield, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.
It is unnecessary to set out the facts in this case, as there is nothing to show that an appeal has been taken to this court. We have repeatedly held that the fact that an appeal has been taken must affirmatively appear. Code, section 3178; rule of court, 98; Gleason v. Collett, 77 Iowa, 448; Schooley v. Globe Ins. Co., 76 Iowa, 78; Donnelly v. Cedar Co., 75 Iowa, 536; State v. Clossner, 84 Iowa, 401. The appeal being necessary to give this court jurisdiction, and none having been taken, the case must be dismissed. Talbort v. Noble, 75 Iowa, 167; Phillips v. Follet, 69 Iowa, 39; Farrell v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phillips v. FolletSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- State ex rel. Farrell v. ClossnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Donnelly v. Cedar CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Gleason v. CollettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Schooley v. Globe InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Clayton v. SievertsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901