Legal Opinion

Metiver v. State, Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 25, 1998No. 98-0398PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

After dismissal of Appellees’ forfeiture action was affirmed on appeal, State Dep’t of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Metiver, 684 So.2d 204 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996), Appellants sought attorney’s fees pursuant to § 932.704(10), Fla.Stat. (1995). That statute provides, in relevant part, that a successful claimant in a forfeiture proceeding is entitled to reasonable trial attorney’s fees “if the court finds that the seizing agency has not proceeded at any stage in the proceedings in good faith or that the agency’s action which precipitated the forfeiture proceedings was a gross abuse of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. LeivaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Stuart Yacht Club & Marina v. STATE, DNRDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. STATE DEPT. OF HWY. & SAF. v. MetiverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Sanderlen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gay v. BearyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API