Legal Opinion
In re Herrman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 8, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Bankruptcy. Former proceedings pending.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
A motion is made for leave to amend the fourth specification of certain creditors in opposition to the bankrupt’s discharge, by alleging the pendency of former proceedings in bankruptcy under the act of' 1807 and of an application for a discharge therein which is still pending and undetermined. That specification, as it stands, states that the discharge of the bankrupt was refused in the former proceeding. Investigation shows that no order to that effect has ever been entered. The moving creditors have a claim which was proved in the former proceedings and which has been…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sandusky v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- In re AdamsUnited States District Court · 1868
- In re ComstockDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1874
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kuntz v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
- In re BramlettDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1908
- Matter of Lincoln Plaza Towers AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- In re SchechtmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938