Legal Opinion

Haddad v. SMG Long Term Disability Plan

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 28, 2021No. 2:16-cv-01700Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FADI G. HADDAD Case No. 16-cv-01700-WHO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON PREJUDMENT INTEREST v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 106 10 SMG LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, AND HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT 11 INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants. 12 The parties are familiar with the underlying facts and long, complex procedural history of 13 this case. Under my prior Orders, there is one issue remaining for my resolution: whether, and if 14 so, what amount of prejudgment interest Hartford owes plaintiff in connection with Hartford’s 15 November 2019 payment of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Penny Grosz-Salomon v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Company, a Provident Company Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Blankenship v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. David Day v. At&t Disability Income PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API