Legal Opinion

Preischel v. Preischel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, objections denied and order of Hearing Examiner reinstated. Memorandum: Family Court erred in dismissing petitioner’s application for a downward modification in child support. Where the applicant demonstrates that there has been an unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances, the court may modify the *1119support obligations of a written separation agreement (Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]; see, Matter of Boden v Boden, 42 NY2d 210, 213; Schelter v Schelter, 159 AD2d 995; Epel v Epel, 139 AD2d 488).

The record establishes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boden v. BodenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Epel v. EpelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Dowd v. DowdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Schelter v. SchelterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meyer v. MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Morena v. MorenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Feld v. FeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API