Legal Opinion

Kellenberger v. Market Street Cable Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1893No. 15,020PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; John F. Finn, Judge. Action by Ida Kellenberger and husband against the Market Street Cable Railway Company to recover damages for personal injuries. From an order granting a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the Court

SEARLS, C.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial. The action was brought to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been received by Ida Kellenberger, wife of her coplaintiff, on the eighth day of April, 1890, while a passenger on the cable car of the defendant. Plaintiff was on a Hayes street car, the gripman of which, as he approached the crossing of the Sutter street cable road on Larkin street, should, it appears, have “let go,’’ or released the cable, but was diverted from doing so by the perilous situation of a pedestrian on the track, and as a result did not let go…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Low v. McCallanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Savage v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Walton v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Taylor v. McKinleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Carson Water Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Goldfield Mohawk Mining Co. v. Frances-Mohawk Mining & Leasing Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API