Legal Opinion

State v. Holloway

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 21, 1984No. 8323SC116PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

After the trial court denied defendant’s motion to suppress evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant, defendant, pursuant to the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-979(b) (1983), entered a plea of guilty to trafficking in methaqualone in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-95(h)(2)(b) (1981 & Supp. 1983) and trafficking in marijuana in violation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-95(h)(l) (b) (1981 & Supp. 1983). Defendant was sentenced to a term of fourteen years. From the court’s ruling on his motion to suppress, the defendant appeals.

I

Defendant first assigns error to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Lo-Ji Sales, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Shadwick v. City of TampaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Brown v. DietrickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Holloway v. WoodardDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. EdmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. State v. HollowayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API