Legal Opinion

People v. Curran

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1916No. Docket No. 131PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Exceptions before sentence from Calhoun; North, J. Tom Curran was convicted of a violation of the local-option law.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

This case is before us upon exceptions before sentence.

The defendant was convicted of a violation of the local-option law, in that he did, on August 18, 1915, at the city of Battle Creek, county of Calhoun, sell a *584quantity of beer and whisky to one Leonard Forester, he, the said defendant, not being then and there a druggist or registered pharmacist, etc. The complaint was made by one Robert C. Towsley, a deputy sheriff, upon information and belief. The warrant issued by the justice of the peace contained the following recital :

“And whereas, on examination on oath of the said R. C. Towsley…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. HeffronMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. People v. BrottMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. People v. ColletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. People v. PaymentMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  5. People v. SchotteyMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. RoneyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. People v. BonneauMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  3. People v. KnopkaMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. Larry SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. O'NEILLMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API