Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Yanez
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided February 21, 2020No. 2:19-cv-05663Unknown
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Ian Shane Bailey, No. CV-19-05663-PHX-ESW 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 Peter W Yanez, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 On December 12, 2019, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in 17 District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2). (Doc. 9). As the Court’s Order 18 explained, Plaintiff’s Complaint must be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). 19 For the reasons explained below, the Court will dismiss the Complaint (Doc. 1) without 20 prejudice and will grant Plaintiff leave to file a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.