Legal Opinion

Daleschal v. Geiser

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Cowley District Court. Action to set aside certain partition proceedings. Judgment for plaintiff Geiser, as guardian, etc., at the January Term, 1885. The defendant Daleschal and two others bring the case to this court. The opinion contains a sufficient statement of the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

In the year 1876, Joseph Bertseh, with his family, consisting of his wife and two small children, Mary and Rosillia, were residing on certain real estate owned by him in Cowley county. During that year the wife died, and he removed to Wyandotte county. On the 25th day of December, 1877, Bertseh married one Antonia Daleschal, and had by her one child, the defendant in error, Frank Bertseh, who was born on the 10th day of November, 1878, and who has ever since his birth resided in Wyandotte county with his mother. At the July term, 1878, of the district court of Wyandotte…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howard v. EntrekenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. Crane v. FippsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCormick v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Huls ex rel. Bork v. LumberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  3. Dangerfield v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1907
  4. Erath v. GlennSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API