Haviland v. Bloom
New York Court of Chancery
THE plaintiff was divorced, a mensa et thoro, on a bill filed (May 27, 1816) by her against her husband, on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment; and the decree directed that the plaintiff should hold and enjoy all the estate, real .and personal, which she inherited from her father, or which she earned after her husband had abandoned her, and that she should have the custody of the children of the marriage; and that Elijah H., the Husband, should be perpetually enjoined…
Read the full summary
THE plaintiff was divorced, a mensa et thoro, on a bill filed (May 27, 1816) by her against her husband, on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment; and the decree directed that the plaintiff should hold and enjoy all the estate, real .and personal, which she inherited from her father, or which she earned after her husband had abandoned her, and that she should have the custody of the children of the marriage; and that Elijah H., the Husband, should be perpetually enjoined from any action at law to recover the said estate, fee. . The bill* after reciting the proceedings and decree as to the…
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The decree recited in the bill, pronounced a divorce, a mensa et thoro, between the plaintiff and her husband, Elijah Haviland, and directed that she should hold and enjoy all the real and personal estate which she had inherited from her father, Samuel Turner7 and that her husband should be perpetually enjoined from any action or proceeding to recover it. This decree was known to each of the defendants, before they caused executions, on judgments against Haviland, to be issued and levied on that estate. This is understood to be a fact admitted by their answers; and the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kenny v. UdallNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barron v. BarronSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
- Delafield v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Brown v. . WadsworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Davis v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1843
- Phillips v. HassellTennessee Supreme Court · 1849
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.