Legal Opinion
Bettilyon Construction Co. v. State Road Commission
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 8, 1968No. 10897PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Chief Justice.
Bettilyon Construction Company appeals from dismissal of its complaint against the State Road Commission whereby it sought recovery for legal expenses incurred in connection with the successful defense of a lawsuit against it by a third party, Eimco Corporation, which challenged the right of way being used in a road construction contract which the Road Commission had let to Bettilyon.
In January, 1963, the State Road Commission, through its Department of Highways, entered into the contract referred to by which Bettilyon was to construct part of the new three-way system…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Campbell Building Co. v. State Road CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Cooper v. WeissblattAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935
- Jensen's Used Cars v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Wunderlich v. State Highway CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- Madison County Construction Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1941
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Primadonna Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Owens & Minor, Inc. v. Ansell Healthcare Products, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Harvest Capital v. West Virginia Department of EnergyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Owens & Minor, Inc. and Owens & Minor Medical, Inc. v. Ansell Healthcare Products, Inc. and Becton, Dickinson and CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Owens & Minor, Inc. and Owens & Minor Medical, Inc. v. Ansell Healthcare Products, Inc. and Becton, Dickinson and CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.