Legal Opinion

Huebner v. Triangle Research Collaborative

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 21, 2008No. COA08-70PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Mark Huebner (“plaintiff’) appeals from an order dismissing his complaint involuntarily and from a judgment in favor of Triangle Research Collaborative and Thaddeus K Szostak (“defendants”). For the reasons stated below, we dismiss this appeal.

I. Background

On 12 July 2002, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants seeking: (1) unpaid wages, liquidated damages, and attorney’s fees pursuant to North Carolina’s Wage and Hour Act (N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 95-25.1 to 95-25.25); and (2) an injunction, reinstatement to employment, and compensation for lost wages, benefits and other economic losses…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Durling v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Booth v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Davis v. KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. E. Brooks Wilkins Family Med., P.A. v. WakemedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. In re ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. Rice v. COHOLANCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Manone v. CoffeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. McKinney v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API