Huebner v. Triangle Research Collaborative
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Per curiam
Mark Huebner (“plaintiff’) appeals from an order dismissing his complaint involuntarily and from a judgment in favor of Triangle Research Collaborative and Thaddeus K Szostak (“defendants”). For the reasons stated below, we dismiss this appeal.
I. Background
On 12 July 2002, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants seeking: (1) unpaid wages, liquidated damages, and attorney’s fees pursuant to North Carolina’s Wage and Hour Act (N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 95-25.1 to 95-25.25); and (2) an injunction, reinstatement to employment, and compensation for lost wages, benefits and other economic losses…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Durling v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Booth v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Davis v. KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
3Cited by13 opinions
- E. Brooks Wilkins Family Med., P.A. v. WakemedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- In re ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Rice v. COHOLANCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Manone v. CoffeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- McKinney v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.