Legal Opinion

Paul P. Ex Rel. Laura L. v. Verniero

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 16, 1999No. 97-5791UnknownCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

I

Plaintiff Paul P. sues on his behalf and on behalf of a class of persons who, having been eonvicted of specified sex crimes, are required to comply with N. J. Stat. Ann. § 2c:7-1 et seq., known as “Megan’s Law,” which provides for a system of registration and community notification. Named as defendants are the Attorney General of New Jersey and numerous County Prosecutors (collectively, the “State defendants”).

In a related action, E.B. v. Verniero, 119 F.3d 1077 (3d Cir.1997), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1039, 140 L.Ed.2d 105 (1998), this…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Paul v. VernieroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Clements v. MoodyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  3. Doe v. KeelDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
  4. Doe v. KeelDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023
  5. Dooley v. Knox County Sheriff's DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API