Legal Opinion
Cudmore v. Cudmore
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 14, 1981No. 13329, 13330PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSHEIM, Justice.
The plaintiff/appellant, W. E. (Ed) Cud-more, instituted this declaratory judgment action for a determination of the respective interests of the parties in certain land purchase contracts. He claimed an eighty percent interest therein. The defendants sought to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint. They also requested a declaratory judgment upholding defendant Leone Cudmore Ne-well’s claim to a one-half interest in the land contracts and her assignment of that one-half interest to defendant Dan Cud-more. The defendants also counterclaimed for an accounting from the plaintiff in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Property Services, Inc. v. BarringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Frederick v. ShormanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- SCHULL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. KoenigSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Kirby Lumber Co. v. Temple Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Williams v. MonzingoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re F. J. F.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Lovald v. Tennyson (In Re Wolk)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Lovald v. Tennyson (In Re Wolk)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- John S. Lovald v. Kathryn M. TennysonUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- John S. Lovald v. Kathryn M. TennysonUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.