Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. Carter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Saginaw. (Gage, J.) .Replevin. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

This action is replevin for a quantity of wheat and oats raised by Carter, as Mrs. Sutherland’s tenant, on her farm, she having on the 1st day of January, 1880, leased the same to Carter for three years,, he agreeing to pay her one-half the hay, grain, roots and fruits, and in good season and good order, as her share for the rent, and deliver the same to her on the farm. They were to share equally in all pasturage and the profits therefrom.

*473The parties seem to have got along, without difficulty until October, 1882, when Carter threshed the grain. At this time when the threshing was completed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Caswell v. DistrichNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. Kaufmann v. SchillingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Fiquet v. AllisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  4. Crouse v. DerbyshireMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Kindy v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ellingboe v. BrakkenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Halsey v. SimmonsOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Collier v. Wm. Cameron & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Adams v. ThorntonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. McClure v. ThorpeMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API