Legal Opinion

Lane v. First Nat. Bank of Greenville

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1919No. 8242PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court,- Hunt County; A. P. Dohoney, Judge. Suit by the First National Bank of Green-ville, Tex., against R. W. Lane and another. To review judgment for plaintiff by default foreclosing writ of attachment on the named defendant’s land, he brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtRainey, C. J.

Suit by defendant in error First National Bank of Greenville to recover on a promissory note for $1,348.65, interest at 10 per cent, per annum and 10 per cent, attorney’s fees against J. C. Dial and R. W. Lane. The petition alleged the execution of the note by Dial and Lane, and that Dial was a resident of Hunt county, and that Lane was a nonresident, being a resident of California. Citation was issued to Hunt county and duly served on Dial. Citation was issued to California and duly served on Lane, the statutory notice for nonresidents being duly served on Mm. After the foregoing proceedings…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901
  2. Milburn v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Findlay v. LumsdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fielder v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Pantaze v. Fox Head Spring Beverage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API