Legal Opinion

Holderness v. Hamilton Fire Ins. Co. of New York

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided February 7, 1944No. Civil Action 637-JPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, citizens of North Carolina, sue upon a policy of fire insurance issued by a New York corporation, covering a building situate in Tarboro, North Carolina, which was subsequently damaged by fire. The contract was neither executed nor delivered in Florida, nor was it to be performed there. The action, being transitory, was commenced in a Florida state court, from which it was removed here.

As the suit was instituted more than twelve months after the fire, the defendant insurance company asserts that it is barred by a provision in the policy to the effect that no…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Griffin v. McCoachSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Bradford Electric Light Co. v. ClapperSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Delta & Pine Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gifford v. Travelers Protective Ass'n of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  2. Menendez v. Saks And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Sun Insurance Office, Limited v. John ClayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. Feller v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1952
  5. Confederation Life Association v. UgaldeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API