Parker v. Rogerson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. Rogerson and Phelps Can Co., defendants in a complex litigation, have appealed both to this court and the Appellate Division from .a final judgment at Supreme Court. The litigation involved Rogerson’s self-dealing with an estate’s capital stock in Phelps while he served as executor. The appeal to this court is by direct appeal pursuant to CPLR 5601 (subd. [d]), seeking review of a prior order of the Appellate Division *753which, inter alia, declared Rogerson and Phelps constructive trustees of the corporate stock and directed an accounting. The appeal to the Appellate Division is by…
2Cited by37 opinions
- Hirsch v. Lindor Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Church v. New York State Thruway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Estate of BellingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- City of New York v. 60 W. 119 Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Knapp v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.