Legal Opinion

Horace E. And Edith B. Nichols v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1975No. 73--3159PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The taxpayer, Horace E. Nichols, is now Chief Justice of the Georgia Supreme Court. On this appeal he argues that the Tax Court erroneously determined that the fee he paid to have his name placed on the ballot in the 1968 Georgia Democratic Primary was not deductible under either section 162, 212 or 164 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.1 We affirm.

The facts as stipulated and relevant to this appeal are as follows. The taxpayer was appointed effective November 16, 1966 to fill an existing vacancy on the Georgia Supreme Court until the next general election on November 5, 1968. In May 1968…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GilmoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. McDonald v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Carey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  4. Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal Revenue v. Gussie L. Davenport, Individually and as Independent of the Estate of F. B. DavenportCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  5. William H. Maness and Betty R. Maness, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cloud v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
  2. Estate of Rockefeller v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  3. Charles C. Diggs, Jr. And Janet H. Diggs v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  4. Estate of Rockefeller v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  5. Levy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API