Legal Opinion

Benz v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1900No. Nos. 11,660, 12,222—(210)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On Application for Writ of Mandamus. Action in the district court for Ramsey county to have boundary lines fixed and established. The case was tried before O. B. Lewis, J., who made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendants (except the city of St. Paul, Rosa W. Kelly, William Louis Kelly, Annie McMillan and James T.' McMillan) appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

The plaintiff owns lots 8 to 14, inclusive, in block 4, of Dawson & Smith’s enlargement of Dawson & Smith’s addition to St. Paul, Ramsey county, Minnesota. The lots front on Jackson street, in said city of St. Paul, and this block is bounded on all sides by public streets. The defendant Stevens owns lots 15 and 16 in said block, in the rear of plaintiff’s said lots, fronting on Sherburne avenue. The other defendants are owners of other lots in said block, except the defendant city of St. Paul, which claims to have an easement in a portion of plaintiff’s lots fronting on Jackson street.

It is…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stadin v. HelinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Benz v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API