Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Kline
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 25, 1980No. 216PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOUIK, Judge:
The Appellant has appealed his conviction by a jury of Sale or Illegal Use of Certain Solvents. In his appeal, the Appellant questions whether the weight of the evidence is sufficient to prove that he used the chemical toluene for a purpose prohibited by the statute. The statute provides, under 18 Pa.C.S.A., § 7303, as follows:
“(a) Offense defined.-No person shall, for the purpose of causing a condition of intoxication, inebriation, excitement, stupefaction, or the dulling of his brain or nervous system, intentionally smell or inhale the fumes from any substance containing a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HolzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. HardickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. CrowsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BowermasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. RodriquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. BowermasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. RodriquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981