Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kline

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1980No. 216PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOUIK, Judge:

The Appellant has appealed his conviction by a jury of Sale or Illegal Use of Certain Solvents. In his appeal, the Appellant questions whether the weight of the evidence is sufficient to prove that he used the chemical toluene for a purpose prohibited by the statute. The statute provides, under 18 Pa.C.S.A., § 7303, as follows:

“(a) Offense defined.-No person shall, for the purpose of causing a condition of intoxication, inebriation, excitement, stupefaction, or the dulling of his brain or nervous system, intentionally smell or inhale the fumes from any substance containing a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. HardickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. CrowsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BowermasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. RodriquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. BowermasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. RodriquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API