Legal Opinion
United States v. Dunn
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 22, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
This is a motion by defendant for a commission dedimus potestatem, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 644, 1 to take the depositions of two specifically named persons resident in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
The defendant is charged by information in three counts with violation of Section 205 of the Federal Seed Act, 7 U.S. C.A. § 1575, and more particularly with disseminating and causing to be disseminated a false advertisement representing seed for sale as “Dwarf Essex Type Rape Seed”, whereas in fact the .said seed was not of this type but was an annual rape seed not suitable…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wong Yim v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. CameronDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1883
- United States v. HofmannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- United States v. WilderU.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Georgia · 1882
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mosseller v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- American Infra-Red Radiant Co. v. Lambert Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1963