Legal Opinion

Carr v. Weld

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1868PublishedCited by 1 opinion

This cause was argued upon bill, answer, and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The are two preliminary questions to be decided in this case before we come to the merits.

The principal witness for the complainant, is E. W. Scudder, Esq., the attorney and counselor who had been ployed by the defendant E. D. Weld, for his brother B. 0. Weld, another defendant, in entering up the judgment to B. 0. Weld, which is the subject matter of the controversy. He was afterwards employed by the complainant and his partner, to draw the article dissolving their partnership, at the execution of which, it is alleged that B. 0. Weld, by-his agent, the defendant E. D. Weld,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson ex. dem. Merrit v. BowenNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  2. Wood v. TorreyNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  3. Ex parte LawrenceNew York Supreme Court · 1825
  4. Alderman v. ShareNew York Supreme Court · 1831

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aysseh v. LawnNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API