Legal Opinion
Rothkoff v. Ratner
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Herman Cahn, J.
Petitioner brings this CPLR article 78 proceeding to annul a determination by the respondent Commissioner of the Department of Consumer Affairs (Commissioner). In said determina*205tian the Commissioner directed petitioner, a licensed auctioneer, to pay to the complainant a sum of money, while finding that petitioner had not committed any acts warranting the taking of any further actions against his license. Petitioner’s arguments focus on the procedural fairness of the way in which Commissioner’s decision was arrived at, and on Commissioner’s authority to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hecht v. MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Matter of Kilgus v. Bd. of Estimate of City of NyNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Joyce v. BruckmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mary M. v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Lewandoski v. Vermont State CollegesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- Vehslage v. Rose Acre Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Flores v. New York State Education DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Gupta v. New York State Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.