Legal Opinion

People v. Kent

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1908No. Docket No. 5PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to recorder’s court of Detroit; Connolly, J. C. A. Kent, Bryant Walker, Mark Sloman, Milton Sloman, and Samuel A. Sloman were convicted of violating an ordinance, and each sentenced to pay a fine of $25. Affirmed as to defendants Sloman, and reversed as- to defendants Kent and Walker, and said defendants discharged.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Defendants Kent and Walker, trustees of the Buhl estate and owners of the premises involved, *135and Mark Sloman, Milton Sloman, and Samuel A. Sloman, doing business as M. Sloman & Co., their tenants in possession, were prosecuted jointly before the recorder’s court of the city of Detroit for violation of a city ordinance. They were tried before the court without a jury, all found guilty and each fined the sum of $25.

The trustee owners and tenants have each come to this court on writs of error. The section of the ordinance under which the prosecution was had reads:

“ Section 5. No owner or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of St. Louis v. KaimeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Midway Landfill, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. People v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. People v. GeorgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API