Legal Opinion

Releford v. Reserve Life Insurance Company

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1955No. A-5084PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent, suing as next friend for her minor children, James Fay Releford and Mary Helen Releford, recovered a judgment against respondent for the sum of $760.00, that sum representing a $500.00 benefit under a provision in respondent’s insurance policy insuring Floyd Releford, petitioner’s husband, against loss of life “resulting from accidental bodily injury,” plus statutory penalty and attorney’s fees. Floyd Releford was killed by petitioner, who was not named as a beneficiary in the policy, under circumstances detailed in an unpublished opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals.

Although…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liberty Film Lines, Inc. v. PorterTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hutcherson v. Sovereign CampTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Hall Music Co. v. RobertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Dockum v. Mercury InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Republic National Life Insurance Co. v. HeywardTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Bolstad v. EglesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Wanda Hastings v. Boston Mutual Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. Vaughn v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  5. Spencer v. Southland Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API