Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Texas International Petroleum Corp.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided February 7, 1986No. Civ. A. W-84-CA-152PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WALTER S. SMITH, Jr., District Judge.

Came on this day to be considered Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Court, having considered said motion, the responses filed thereto, and having heard argument from counsel on this issue, enters the following memorandum opinion and order.

It is appropriate for the Court to grant a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure when there exists no genuine issue of material fact. See Meredith v. Hardy, 554 F.2d 764 (5th Cir.1977). In the case at bar, the Court finds no genuine…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dan Duran v. Richard J. ElrodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Cooper v. HinerTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Antwine v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Garcia v. VillarrealCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gray v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API