State v. Wiskow
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARKIN, Judge.
Appellant challenges his sentence for aggravated robbery in the first degree, arguing that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial when it based imposition of an upward durational departure under section 609.1095, subdivision 2, on a judicial determination that his Wisconsin burglary conviction is for a violent crime. We hold that a district court may constitutionally determine whether an out-of-state conviction is for a violent crime when sentencing under section 609.1095, so long as the district court’s determination is limited to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- State v. JuarezSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Willie Edd Reynolds v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016