Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Saab

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1921No. Appeal, No. 74PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 74, April T., 1921, by defendant, from sentence of Q. S. of Fayette County, June Sessions, 1920, No. 59, in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mary Saab. Indictment for selling liquor without a license. Before Reppert, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict of guilty on which judgment of sentence was passed. Defendant appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 74, April T., 1921, by defendant, from sentence of Q. S. of Fayette County, June Sessions, 1920, No. 59, in the case of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mary Saab. Indictment for selling liquor without a license. Before Reppert, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict of guilty on which judgment of sentence was passed. Defendant appealed. Assignments of error were various rulings on evidence, charge of the court and refusal to quash the indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The defendant was indicted with Mike Mondalek for selling liquor without license. In an opinion now filed, we have dismissed the exceptions in the appeal of Mike Mondalek and affirmed the judgment. All of the questions raised by the appellant are disposed of in that' opinion except that in the sixth assignment in which exception is taken to the refusal of the court to affirm the defendant’s point that under all the evidence the defendant, Mary Mondalek, alias Mary Saab, “she being the wife of Mike Mondalek, on the charge of misdemeanor under the evidence cannot be…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FinchSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Guerra v. Hiduk, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Washington County1931
  3. Commonwealth v. JonesLehigh County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API