Legal Opinion

Hartman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 8, 2010No. 4D09-5005Published

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s order of October 23, 2009, which dismisses appellant’s “letter/motion” as frivolous and forwards a copy of the order to the Department of Corrections. See Johnson v. State, 44 So.3d 198 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). That order does not include language barring future pro se filings in the circuit court. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999); Fitzgerald v. State, 18 So.3d 1145 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Epps v. State, 941 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006); see also Thomas v. State, 1 So.3d 194 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). This court’s affirmance does not prevent appellant from seeking…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Epps v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Fitzgerald v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API