Frankel v. Miami Butterine Co.

Grice, Justice.

1. Where a suit was instituted by “L. Frankel trading as Fulton Distributing Company,” it was not error, as a matter of law, for the court to make Louis Frankel a party plaintiff in response to a prayer in the answer of the defendant wherein it was alleged that Louis Frankel was the real owner of Fulton Distributing Company, and that the petition was filed in the name of L. Ffankel for the purpose of misleading the defendant, that the “L.” is supposed to stand for “Leo,” but that Louis Frankel instigated the suit and is using the initial “L.” or the name “Leo” as a dummy, and…