Legal Opinion

Franklin National Bank v. Phoenix Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1958Published

1Opinion of the CourtHowabd T. Hogan, J.

Plaintiff, pursuant to rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice, seeks an order striking out the defendants’ answers and directing the entry of summary judgment.

The second cause of action is based upon a promissory note for $350,000 made by the defendant, Kingsvale Builders, Inc., and indorsed by the codefendants Peter B. Torti and Gerald Krupka. The first cause of action is against the defendant Phoenix Insurance Company, based upon its bond guaranteeing payment of the note.

The defendant Krupka has defaulted in pleading. The defendants Kingsvale Builders, Inc., and Torti, while they have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. General Phoenix Corp. v. CabotNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Vetter v. ZerweokAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Sweeney v. Metropolitan Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API