Legal Opinion
Gambill v. Greenwood
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided July 26, 1945No. 6 Div. 194PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
Appellants’ testator is the complainant in a suit in equity, and bases her standing in equity upon the declaratory judgments statutes of Alabama. Sections 156 et seq., Title 7, Code. She claims to be the assignee of a.judgment rendered on August 7, 1931, in favor of A. A. Gambill and Company, then a body corporate, against Angel Cassimus, Arthur Greenwood and W. F.. Potts, and that the assignment was by a deed executed by the corporation of all its-assets to complainant dated September 4, 1934, but was not assigned as provided in section 579, Title 7, Code; that only one…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hayward v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- New York Guaranty Company v. Memphis Water CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Bagwell v. Woodward Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Masterson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Gardner v. Mobile & Northwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dozier v. Troy Drive-In-Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Donoghue v. BunkleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Callen v. CallenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Horan v. HoranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Mooney v. WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.