Legal Opinion
State v. Kimpel
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 11, 2018No. 17–17–12PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWillamowski, P.J.
*436 {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Dean A. Kimpel ("Kimpel") appeals the judgment of the Shelby County Court of Common Pleas for (1) denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea; (2) considering statements that were inadmissible; and (3) considering charges that were without merit. For the reasons set forth below, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Facts and Procedural History
{¶ 2} During his time as Shelby County Sheriff, Kimpel hired Jodi Van Fossen ("Van Fossen") as a detective in 2010. Tr. 8. On July 24, 2010, Van Fossen had a sexual encounter with Kimpel at her home in Auglaize…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. McBethOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. KimpelOhio Court of Appeals · 2018