Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. v. Cox

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 23, 2011No. 3D08-2704Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partShepherd, J.

This is an appeal by Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. (Royal Caribbean) from a final judgment in the sum of $1,403,791.90 *419in favor of Byron Cox, who slipped and fell while performing his job as a galley utility pot washer on Royal Caribbean’s Majesty of the Seas on January 12, 2004. Royal Caribbean challenges two adverse decisions made by the trial court during the course of trial: (1) failure to charge the jury on an affirmative defense that exists in the law of admiralty known as the “primary duty doctrine”; and (2) allowing plaintiffs vocational rehabilitation expert to testify concerning new…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Binger v. King Pest ControlSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Walker v. Lykes Bros. S.S. Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. Grau v. BranhamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Lombas v. Moran Towing & Transportation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. Billie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API