State Ex Rel. Stain v. Christensen
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentMoffat, Justice
I dissent. From the title of this case it would appear to be the usual case of plaintiff against two defendants. The issues, however, are more complicated. It is a triangular case. Though not of the nature or character of the “Eternal-Triangle,” the problems are as complicated and in certain aspects quite as perplexing, although the facts are not in dispute. I hesitate to express my disagreement with the conclusion reached by my brethren of the court. As to who may perform the duties of the office of State Treasurer is of no serious moment. The legislative and constitutional implications,…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- State ex rel. Attorney-General v. CovingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1876
- Thomas v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Glavey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- State ex rel. Workman v. GoldthaitIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- People ex rel. Hoyne v. McCormickIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.