Legal Opinion

Pigford v. Veneman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 23, 2015No. Civil Action No. 1997-1978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on the motion for fees, costs, and expenses filed by Faya Rose Toure, a/k/a Rose M. Sanders (“Ms. Sanders”), which seeks $17,212 for work performed and expenses incurred between September 1, 2014 and December 30, 2014, implementing the Consent Decree in this case. The United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) does not dispute that Ms. Sanders is entitled to an appropriate fee for her work on the wind-down stipulation and order during this time, but it challenges all of Ms. Sanders’s time…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. National Ass'n of Concerned Veterans v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  4. Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  5. Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cobell Ex Rel. Cobell v. JewellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API