Legal Opinion

Snelling & Snelling of Massachusetts, Inc. v. Wall

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 29, 1963PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirk, J.

The plaintiff (Snelling) sought to enjoin the defendant (Wall) and the defendant Tec, Inc., a corporation organized by Wall, from operating an employment agency in violation of a restrictive covenant in a contract of employment between Snelling and Wall. Snelling also asked for damages. Temporary injunctive relief was granted. The injunction was dissolved following the expiration of one year from the termination of Wall’s employment with Snelling, as provided in the contract.

Snelling no longer seeks injunctive relief. It does, however, claim damages. We limit our consideration of the case to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Edgecomb v. EdmonstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. White Spot Construction Corp. v. Jet Spray Cooler, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Hendricks & Associates, Inc. v. Daewoo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Puritan Medical Center, Inc. v. CashmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Boston Children's Heart Foundation, Inc. v. Nadal-GinardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Locklin v. Day-Glo Color Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
  5. Air Safety, Inc. v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API