Legal Opinion

Steffens v. Keeler

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1993No. Docket 137697PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendants appeal as of right the order granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(9) and (10) and denying defendants’ motion for summary disposition. Defendants claim that the trial court erred in finding that § 3 of the Right to Farm Act (rtfa), MCL 286.473; MSA 12.122(3), did not preclude plaintiffs’ private nuisance claim and in finding that defendants’ pig farm constituted a nuisance in fact.

Plaintiffs moved into their house on February 7, 1985. At that time there was a vacant dairy barn and a house on the property across the street from their home.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosario v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Li v. FeldtMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Northville Township v. CoyneMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Orion Charter Township v. Burnac Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Village of Peck v. HoistMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Steffens v. KeelerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API