Legal Opinion

State v. Readus

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 10, 1988PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WILLIAM S. RUSSELL, Special Judge.

The single issue before the court is the proper interpretation and application of Rule 5(a) of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure, which rule explicitly requires that an arrested person be taken before a magistrate without unnecessary delay.

This case is before us on a Rule 9 interlocutory appeal granted to the State. We are urged by the State to reverse an order of the trial court suppressing evidence of an electronically recorded confession taken by police officers from the appellee, Marvin Readus, about three to three and a half hours after he…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. People v. CiprianoMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Wynn v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State Ex Rel. Reed v. HeerTennessee Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. MiddlebrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. CarterTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API