Legal Opinion

O'MALLEY v. Vilsmeier Auctions Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 1997No. Civ.A. 97-2334PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER and MEMORANDUM

KATZ, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 1997, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendants from introducing Evidence Regarding or Otherwise Mentioning Plaintiff James D. O’Malley’s, Election of Insurance Coverage at Trial, and the response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the said motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs shall be allowed to present evidence on and recover for their economic damages, but plaintiffs must prove a serious injury to recover pain and suffering damages.

Introduction

The issue disputed in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Edward C. LeJEUNE; Deborah LeJeune, Appellants, v. BLISS-SALEM, INC.; E.W. Bliss Company; General Electric Co., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  4. Carlson v. BubashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Thomas v. HanmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Antique Automobile Club of AmericaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. LIFEMD, INC v. LAMARCODistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. TJAHJONO v. WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATIONDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API